BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California
    Anaheim California roofing construction expertAnaheim California construction safety expertAnaheim California construction expertsAnaheim California expert witness commercial buildingsAnaheim California ada design expert witnessAnaheim California building code expert witnessAnaheim California forensic architect
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211

    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211

    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501
    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501
    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614

    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614

    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614

    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Anaheim, California Roofing Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Anaheim's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Supreme Court Strikes Down IEEPA Tariffs: The Refund Process Will Be Messy

    March 10, 2026 —
    On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, and the consolidated case Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs unilaterally.1 The decision invalidates both the “reciprocal” tariffs and the drug-trafficking tariffs imposed under IEEPA. For importers, the immediate question is whether, how, and when refunds can actually be obtained. On that issue, the U.S. Supreme Court provided no roadmap. To the contrary, the dissent warned that the United States “may be required to refund billions of dollars,” that the process is likely to be a “mess,” and that the majority opinion “says nothing today about whether, and if so how, the Government should go about returning the billions of dollars that it has collected from importers.” Reprinted courtesy of Brett W. Johnson, Snell & Wilmer, Derek Flint, Snell & Wilmer, T. Troy Galan, Snell & Wilmer and Thomas Williams, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Johnson may be contacted at bwjohnson@swlaw.com Mr. Flint may be contacted at dflint@swlaw.com Mr. Galan may be contacted at tgalan@swlaw.com Mr. Williams may be contacted at twilliams@swlaw.com> Read the full story...

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Associate Miguel Bonnelly as Orlando Office Continues to Grow

    December 15, 2025 —
    ORLANDO, FL – Ball Janik LLP is pleased to welcome Associate Miguel Bonnelly to the firm’s Construction Defect Practice Group in the Orlando office. Bonnelly brings experience from a leading nationwide personal injury law firm, where he represented homeowners and homeowners’ associations (HOAs) and businesses in complex construction matters. From construction defect matters to drafting Chapter 558 notices and conducting hearings, inspections, depositions, mediations, and settlements, Bonnelly is savvy in providing effective solutions for clients’ needs. “We’re pleased to welcome Miguel to the firm,” said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner of Ball Janik LLP. “His experience representing homeowners in complex construction matters is a perfect match for our firm, and we are eager for his thoughtful, results-driven counsel that will make a difference for our clients.” Bonnelly is fluent in both English and Spanish, creating greater accessibility for firm clients. He received his law degree from the University of Florida Levin College of Law and his bachelor’s degree from the University of Central Florida in legal studies, where he had the highest overall GPA. While in law school, he served as a legal intern at a boutique law firm with a focus on real property disputes, estate administration, and breach of contract claims, and at Community Legal Services of Mid Florida, providing civil aid in the housing unit throughout central Florida. “I’m excited to be joining a firm with such talented professionals and resources that make a profound difference for clients,” said Bonnelly. “The firm’s focus on collaboration and track record for excellence and results make this an ideal opportunity for the next chapter of my legal career.” About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Read more here: https://www.balljanik.com/.

    Insured’s Motion to Compel Production of Underwriting Materials Granted

    November 04, 2025 —
    The Supreme Court of New York granted the insured’s motion to compel the production of underwriting materials related to identifying additional insureds. Church of St. Andrew v. Western World Ins. Co., 2025 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 7018 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Aug. 5, 2025). The Church of St. Andrew (“church”) retained GC Solutions to perform roofing work at its premises. The church required GC Solutions to name it as an additional insured under its general liability policy. GC Solutions provided a Certificate of Insurance naming the church as an additional insured under the policy issued by Western World. While working on the roof, an employee of GC Solutions fell to his death. A wrongful death action was commenced by the decedent’s estate against the church. The church tendered its defense and indemnification to Western World. Western World disclaimed coverage, asserting that the church did not qualify as an additional insured under the policy. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Allegations in Insured’s Complaint Sufficient to Survive Motion to Dismiss

    November 09, 2025 —
    The insured’s complaint sufficiently pled breach of contract and bad faith to survive the insurer’s motion to dismiss. Macias v. Am. Family Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148628 (D. Colo. Aug. 1, 2025). A hailstorm damaged the insureds’ property, including the roof. The insureds filed a claim (Claim One) with American Family. An adjuster assigned by American Family found storm-related damage to the gutters, window screens and lattice work, but only non-storm-related damage to other items, such as the roof. American Family determined the losses amounted to $1,104.97, which was below the deductible. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Why Construction Tendering Needs Specialized Intelligence

    March 31, 2026 —
    The construction industry has never lacked data; it lacks usable intelligence at the moments that matter most. In the high-stakes phases of tendering and pre-construction, the industry still relies on manual “Control-F” searches through thousands of pages of unstructured documents. I recently spoke with Herman Smith, a civil engineer and former Chief Digital Officer at Multiconsult, who left the corporate world to solve this specific bottleneck. His startup, Volve, isn’t just another AI wrapper; it is a specialized “drill” designed to penetrate the complexity of construction documentation. The Paradox of Digitalization without a Productivity Boost For years, the AEC industry has faced a frustrating paradox: we have more digital tools than ever, yet productivity has not improved. Herman observed this from the inside, managing hundreds of unique software licenses while seeing companies struggle to adapt to new workflows. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Did You Get the Message? (And does it count?) The Legal Consequences of Text Messages, Group Chats, and Informal Digital Communication on Construction Projects

    March 17, 2026 —
    Introduction: The New Reality of Construction Communication Construction projects have always depended on a constant stream of communication. Today’s project managers, superintendents, and foremen have broadened the method of communication to include convenient forms of digital communication. Superintendents text photos of field conditions, owners send quick approvals through WhatsApp, architects clarify design intent in a Teams chat, and subcontractors coordinate sequencing through group texts. These channels are fast, convenient, and deeply embedded in modern project culture. Yet the legal framework governing construction contracts has not evolved at the same pace. Many contracts still assume – or require – that notice, directives, and approvals occur through formal written channels—letters, emails to designated recipients, or structured project‑management platforms. This disconnect creates significant legal risk, particularly for contractors who rely on informal messages as authorization for extra work or schedule changes. Courts are increasingly asked to interpret text messages, chat threads, and screenshots as evidence of notice, direction, or waiver. The outcomes vary, but the trend is unmistakable: informal digital communication is now part of the project record, and it can bind parties in ways they did not expect. Reprinted courtesy of Kellie Ros, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Curtis Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Ms. Ros may be contacted at kros@pecklaw.com Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Newark Team Obtains Appellate Ruling Affirming Summary Judgment for Lawyer and Firm in Professional Negligence Lawsuit

    April 14, 2026 —
    Newark Partner Meredith Kaplan Stoma and Associate Anthony Doss recently secured a decision from the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, affirming summary judgment for their clients, a lawyer and her firm, in a lawsuit alleging professional negligence in connection with the administration of a commercial loan. The circumstances giving rise to the lawsuit date back to September 2020, when the plaintiff was approached by members of a real estate investment company regarding a short-term loan opportunity whereby he would loan the company $200,000. The company provided the plaintiff with a “bridge
    One Colorado Court Allows Negligence Claim by General Contractor Against Subcontractor

    Construction Defect Lawsuit May Affect Home Financing

    Gilbert’s Plan for Downtown Detroit Has No Room for Jail

    Claim Preclusion: The Doctrine Everyone Thinks They Know But No One Really Knows What it Means in Practice

    Is the Manhattan Bank of America Tower a Green Success or Failure?

    The Modern Nuclear Renaissance Reaches New England

    Designing the Process to Deliver Zero-Carbon Construction – Computational Design in Practice

    Court of Appeal Puts the “Equity” in Equitable Subrogation

    Georgia State and Local Governments Receive Expanded Authority for Conservation Projects

    The Benefits of Trash Talking: A Cautionary Tale of Demolition Gone Wrong

    ISO’s Flood Exclusion Amendments and Hurricane Ian C
    Evaluating Construction Trends From 2023 and Forecasting For 2024

    Wildfire Risks Elevated for US Plains Due to Drought Conditions

    Oregon to Add 258,000 Jobs by 2022, State Data Shows

    Finalists in San Diego’s Moving Parklet Design Competition Announced

    Missouri Construction Company Sues Carpenter Union for Threatening Behavior

    How U.S. Design and Architecture Firms Can Profit from the Chinese Market and Avoid Pitfalls

    Partner Bradley T. Guldalian Secures Summary Judgment Win for National Hotel Chain

    Economy in U.S. Picked Up on Consumer Spending, Construction

    Someone Who Hires an Independent Contractor May Still Be Liable, But Not in This Case

    Quick Note: Not In Contract With The Owner? Serve A Notice To Owner.

    Where There's Smoke...California's New Emergency Wildfire Smoke Protection Regulation And What Employers Are Required To Do

    A Good Examination of Fraud, Contract and Negligence Per Se

    How to Protect the High-Tech Home

    Federal Court Asks South Dakota Supreme Court to Decide Whether Injunction Costs Are “Damages,” Adopts Restatement’s Position on Providing “Inadequate” Defense

    Mercury News Editorial Calls for Investigation of Bay Bridge Construction

    Real Estate Firms Push to Preserve Carried Interest Tax Break

    The Evolution of Construction Defect Trends at West Coast Casualty Seminar

    Another Colorado Construction Defect Reform Bill Dies

    Top 10 Construction Contract Provisions – Changes and Claims

    West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar Announced for 2014

    ISO’s Flood Exclusion Amendments and Hurricane Ian Claims

    What’s the Best Way to “Use” a Construction Attorney?

    Courthouse Reporter Series: The Bizarre Case That Required a 117-Year-Old Expert

    Expert Can be Questioned on a Construction Standard, Even if Not Relied Upon

    The National Building Museum’s A-Mazing Showpiece

    New Tariffs Could Shorten Construction Expansion Cycle

    COVID-19 Business Interruption Claims Four Years Later: What Have We Learned?

    Ensuring Arbitration in Construction Defect Claims

    No Prejudicial Error in Refusing to Give Jury Instruction on Predominant Cause

    Baby Boomer Housing Deficit Coming?

    “Don’t Coblentz - You Might Miss It!”

    Hawaii Court of Appeals Finds Insured AOAO Not Liable for Securing Inadequate Insurance

    Five Pointers for Enforcing a Non-Compete Agreement in Texas

    Lessee Deemed Statutory Employer, Immune from Tort Liability by Pennsylvania Court

    What The U.S. Can Learn from China to Bring Its Buildings to New Heights

    Chinese Lead $92 Billion of U.S. Home Sales to Foreigners

    A Court-Side Seat: Clean Air, Clean Water, Citizen Suits and the Summer of 2022

    Five Steps Employers Should Take In the Second Year Of the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Wendel Rosen’s Construction Practice Group Welcomes Quinlan Tom

    New York Court Holds That the “Lesser of Two” Doctrine Limits Recoverable Damages in Subrogation Actions

    Civil RICO Case Against Johnny Doc Is Challenging

    Contractor Prevails on Summary Judgment To Establish Coverage under Subcontractor's Policy

    Bally's Secures Funding for $1.7B Chicago Casino and Hotel Project

    Pollution Created by Business Does Not Deprive Insured of Coverage

    Insurer Has Duty to Defend Faulty Workmanship Claim

    Massachusetts Couple Seek to Recuse Judge in Construction Defect Case

    Perez Broke Records … But Should He Have Settled Earlier?

    Tampa Office Secures Summary Judgment for Property Owner Client in Trip-and-Fall Lawsuit

    Trump Replaces Architect to Lead $300 Million Ballroom Design

    The New “White Collar” Exemption Regulations
    prop="name">Texas Federal Court Finds Total Pollution Exclusion Does Not Foreclose a Duty to Defend Waterway Degradation Lawsuit

    Maryland Enacts Climate-Cost Study Over Veto, New Jersey Advances Climate Superfund Proposal as Earlier State Laws Face Ongoing Court Challenges

    How Finns Cut Construction Lead Times in Half

    Foreclosure Deficiency: Construction Loan vs. Home Improvement Loan

    Construction Manager’s Win in Michigan after Michigan Supreme Court Finds a Subcontractor’s Unintended Faulty Work is an ‘Occurrence’ Under CGL

    No Coverage for Breach of Contract Claims Against Contractor

    Keep it Simple with Nunn-Agreements in Colorado

    Don’t Hire Me! (Principle Is Expensive, and Lawsuits Based on Principle Are Even More Expensive)

    Giant Gas Pipeline Owner, Contractor in $900M Payment Battle