BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    office building expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California
    Anaheim California construction safety expertAnaheim California expert witness commercial buildingsAnaheim California construction expert witnessAnaheim California concrete expert witnessAnaheim California roofing and waterproofing expert witnessAnaheim California expert witnesses fenestrationAnaheim California expert witness structural engineer
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211

    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211

    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501
    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501
    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614

    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614

    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614

    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Anaheim, California Roofing Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Anaheim's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Builders Oppose Senate Housing Bill Over Investor Ban Provision

    March 24, 2026 —
    A powerful group representing the nation’s home builders is coming out against the most significant housing legislation in more than a decade over a provision negotiated by the White House that would restrict institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes. The builders’ objection could imperil the bill’s chances of becoming law, even as leaders of both parties are desperate to show they are doing something to alleviate voters’ cost-of-living concerns. The Senate voted 90-8 to clear a procedural hurdle for the bill on Wednesday, with a vote on final passage expected early next week. The inclusion of the investor ban in a broader housing bill was key to getting the White House on board, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina, told reporters Tuesday. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Katy O'Donnell, Bloomberg

    SDV Celebrates 30th Anniversary Press Release

    April 08, 2026 —
    Trumbull, Connecticut – Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV) is proud to announce the celebration of its 30th anniversary. Founded in 1996 by three attorneys in a small New Haven, Connecticut office, SDV was built on a clear and focused mission: representing policyholders in insurance coverage matters. Three decades later, that commitment remains at the core of the firm’s identity and has been instrumental in its continued success and reputation nationwide. Today, SDV is a nationally recognized boutique firm with 50 attorneys serving policyholders across the United States. Building on its longstanding reputation for excellence and client advocacy, the firm is pleased to announce the opening of its newest office in Massachusetts—an exciting milestone that reflects SDV’s continued growth. The new office is led by Managing Partner Anna Perry. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.

    Only A Contractor Can Appeal a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision

    April 20, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals confirms that “only a ‘contractor’ may file an appeal of a contracting officer’s final decision.” Wattiker v. General Services Administration, 2026 WL 846001 (CBCA 2026) (citation omitted). The term “contractor is not an ambiguous term. A ‘contractor’ refers to a party to a federal government contract. Wattiker (citing the Contract Disputes Act). This is why the Contract Disputes Act does not apply to parties that are NOT in contract with the federal government. Id. In Wattiker, an appellant (appealing party) challenged the dismissal of a co-appellant. The co-appellant was dismissed because he was not a contractor, i.e., a party in contract with the federal government. In other words, the co-appellant had no privity of contract with the federal government. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    New Legislation Requires Changes to your California Home Improvement Contract for 2026

    November 18, 2025 —
    California Business and Professions Code 7159, first enacted in 2004, was intended as a consumer protection measure to protect homeowners hiring contractors for home improvement work. The legislation sought to meet this laudable goal by dictating the terms to be used in home improvement contracts. covering everything from mandatory contractual language, lists of documents to be included, legal warnings to be provided, dispute resolution procedures, dictating where to initial, where to sign and even font size. The legislation unfortunately made it impossible to provide a homeowner with anything more than a complex multi-page legal document which many homeowners viewed with suspicion. The unintended consequence is that those contractors who violate the law and use a short but simple one or two-page, but illegal contract end up obtaining work. Those who follow the law and use the multi-page legally mandated contract end up losing customers because the contract is long, complex and frightening. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of William L. Porter, Porter Law Group
    Mr. Porter may be contacted at bporter@porterlaw.com

    Why Travelers Fought a Fire Claim for Invisible Smoke Damage

    February 23, 2026 —
    Just 40 minutes after midnight on Sept. 27, 2018, the sky lit up over Birmingham, Ala. A fire engulfed an apartment building under construction—the last-to-be completed section of a wood-framed complex called the Metropolitan. It fueled one of the largest recorded blazes in the city’s history. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Construction and Design Contracts—They Are More Important Than You Might Think! (Law Note)

    January 26, 2026 —
    As regular readers of this Blog know, contracts are extremely important for all parties involved in a construction project. While verbal contracts can be enforced, a written contract, which is finely-tuned to your specific project, can save you a lot of time and money later on if the proverbial poo hits the fan. I recently read AIA’s take on contracts, in their Construction Risk Brief (which you should subscribe to [free] if you have not already). Their featured article is on “Best Practices for Construction Contracts”. In the piece, they discuss 7 key points to address in each contract. I concur for the most part, although want to point out that some of them (such as the regular monitoring and documentation bullet point) are deserving of their own post, as there is a *lot* that can and does go wrong during the construction administration phase. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Melissa Dewey Brumback, Ragsdale Liggett PLLC
    Ms. Brumback may be contacted at mbrumback@rl-law.com

    Insured Successfully Moves to Dismiss Insurer’s Suit to Eliminate Duty to Defend

    January 06, 2026 —
    The court found that the insurer had a duty to defend and dismissed the insurer’s motion for summary judgment. Travelers Indem. Co. of Conn. v. I.C. Refrigeration Services Inc., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 221768 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2025). Flory Construction, Inc. sued the project owner, Highbridge, asserting claims for (1) foreclosure on mechanics liens; (2) breach of contract; and other cliams. Flory agreed to furnish labor, materials and equipment for improvements to Highbridge’s properties. Flory alleges Highbridge failed to provide payment despite Flory completing “all requested contract work . . . except to the extent prevented by Highbridge.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Florida's Third DCA Reasserts the Teeth of Chapter 558 and the Future of Construction Defect Litigation

    February 23, 2026 —
    The case of Moss & Associates, LLC v. Daystar Peterson and Brickell Heights East Condominium Association, Inc. represents a quiet but significant correction in Florida construction law litigation. The Florida Third District Court of Appeal granted a petition for writ of certiorari and quashed a trial court order that denied a contractor's motion to stay litigation under Chapter 558, Florida Statutes. Though procedurally narrow, the ruling reflects an increasingly assertive appellate stance. Chapter 558's pre-suit
    National Lobbying Firm Opens Colorado Office, Strengthening Construction Defect Efforts

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Sudden Death”

    Construction Spending Drops in March

    Investigators Explain Focus on Pre-Collapse Cracking in Florida Bridge

    High Attendance Predicted for West Coast Casualty Seminar

    Apartment Construction Increasing in Colorado while Condo Construction Remains Slow

    Intentional Mining Neighbor's Property is Not an Occurrence

    Insurer Must Cover Portions of Arbitration Award
    Merger to Create Massive Los Angeles Construction Firm

    Admissibility of Expert Opinions in Insurance Bad Faith Trials

    Coverage Issues: When You Need Your Own Lawyer in a Construction Defect Suit

    How the Parking Garage Conquered the City

    Tampa Team Obtains Highly Favorable Verdict for Property Owner Client in Lawsuit over Traffic Accident

    Balancing Risk and Reward: The Complexities of Stadium Construction Projects

    Concerns About On-the-job Safety Persist

    When is an Indemnification Provision Unenforceable?

    You’ve Made Your Bed…Maybe Don’t Lie in It (Yet)!

    Angela Cooner Appointed Vice-Chair of Arizona’s Inaugural Board of Legal Specialization Construction Defect Law Advisory Commission

    NYPD Investigating Two White Flags on Brooklyn Bridge

    $6 Million in Punitive Damages for Chinese Drywall

    Construction Defect Coverage Summary 2013: The Business Risks Shift To Insurers

    Unjust Enrichment Claims When There Is No Binding Contract

    MBIA Seeks Data in $1 Billion Credit Suisse Mortgage Suit

    PFAS: From Happy Mistake to Ubiquity to Toxic Liability (But is there coverage?)

    Corporate Formalities: A Necessary Part of Business

    The Biggest Thing Keeping Young Homebuyers out of the Market Isn't Student Debt

    New Hampshire Applies Crete/Sutton Doctrine to Bar Subrogation Against College Dormitory Residents

    EPA Seeks Comment on Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification Rule

    Fundamental Fairness Trumps Contract Language

    Newmeyer & Dillion Gets Top-Tier Practice Area Rankings on U.S. News – Best Lawyers List

    Colorado Statutes of Limitations and Repose, A First Step in Construction Defect Litigation

    Kumagai Drops Most in 4 Months on Building Defect: Tokyo Mover

    New Stormwater Climate Change Tool

    Chicago Debt Document Says $8.5B O'Hare Revamp May Be Delayed

    Haight Brown & Bonesteel Ranked on the 2017 "Best Law Firms" List by U.S. News - Best Lawyers

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in “The Best Lawyers in America” & “Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch” 2025 Editions

    Wait, You Want An HOA?! Restricting Implied Common-Interest Communities

    Faulty Workmanship Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage

    NYC Billionaires’ Row Tower Could Need $160M Fix Amid Cracking

    New Member Added to Seattle Law Firm Williams Kastner

    DC Metro Extension’s Precast Supplier Banned from Federal Contracts

    Insurer Not Entitled to Summary Judgment on Construction Defect, Bad Faith Claims

    Home Building Up in Kansas City

    Sensors for Smarter Construction – Interview with Laura Kassovic of MbientLab

    California Appellate Court Holds “Minimal Causal Connection” Satisfies Causation Requirement in All Risk Policies

    Suit Limitation Provision Upheld

    Traub Lieberman Partner Lisa M. Rolle Wins Summary Judgment in Favor of Third-Party Defendant

    Underpowered AC Not a Construction Defect

    Newmeyer & Dillion Attorney Alan Packer Selected to the 2017 Northern California Super Lawyers List

    Surety Liability Is Coextensive with Its Bond Principal

    EPA Rejects Most of N.Y.’s $511 Million Tappan Zee Loan

    David Uchida Joins Kahana Feld’s Los Angeles Office as Partner

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Reaffirms Validity of Statutory Employer Defense

    AECOM Out as General Contractor on $1.6B MSG Sphere in Las Vegas

    Steven L. Heisdorffer Joins Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell

    South Carolina Clarifies the Accrual Date for Its Statute of Repose

    There Are Consequences to Executed Documents Such as the Accord and Satisfaction Defense

    What is Toxic Mold Litigation?

    Suit Against Broker for Securing Inadequate Coverage Dismissed on Statute of Limitations Grounds
    href="/bhastory.php?cdjs=163782720">Court Again Defines Extent of Contractor’s Insurance Coverage

    The Contractor’s Contingency: What Contractors and Construction Managers Need to Know and Be Wary Of

    Teaching An Old Dog New Tricks: The Spearin Doctrine and Design-Build Projects

    Substantiating Termination for Convenience Costs