Recovering Attorney’s Fees and Arguing the Fees Are Inextricably Intertwined
December 02, 2025 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesAttorney’s fees are a big part of any dispute. And the attorney’s fees should be because fees are a factor and can ultimately drive the outcome of a dispute. No one wants to spend $100,000 in fees to recover $100,000, so the conversation regarding attorney’s fees needs to be had early.
Generally, a party can recover reasonable attorney’s fees if authorized by contract or by statute. So, there would need to be a prevailing party attorney’s fees provision in a contract, if suing on a contract, or there would need to be a statute authorizing the recovery of attorney’s fees, if suing on a statute. Then, there is authority that the party still needs to prevail on the significant issues in the dispute, as determined by the trial court (or binding arbitrator), in order to be the prevailing party for purposes of attorney’s fees. (Absent that, you are dealing with a proposal for settlement to create a procedural basis to recover fees, which is explained here.) Reasonable attorney’s fees, however, does not mean you will recover 100% of your attorney’s fees. Some percentage will presumably be discounted meaning becoming 100% whole when factoring in attorney’s fees is not always a practical outlook.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
SDNY Ruling Highlights Privilege Risks in Client Use of Generative AI
March 03, 2026 —
Christopher J. Olsen, Freddy X. Muñoz & Gary M. Stein - Peckar & Abramson, P.C.Artificial intelligence is quickly becoming a go‑to tool for aggregating and summarizing large volumes of data, formulating and testing arguments, and even sketching litigation strategies. But a recent ruling from the Southern District of New York serves as a stark warning: when clients turn to generative AI for legal strategy, they may be unknowingly turning privileged information over to a third party and then creating documents that may later be discoverable in litigation. In a closely watched bench decision, Judge Rakoff ruled that AI‑generated documents created by the target of a criminal investigation using Anthropic’s Claude were not privileged despite being generated with information learned from his attorneys to support his potential legal defense and then shared with his counsel. The decision highlights the unresolved and increasingly consequential intersection of AI, privilege, and discovery.
Facts
Bradley Heppner received a grand jury subpoena and hired attorneys at Quinn Emanuel to represent him. After learning he was a target of the investigation, but before he was arrested, he created 31 documents with Claude using information from his attorneys to outline a potential defense strategy. He was later arrested on charges of securities and wire fraud, and federal agents seized his electronic devices, which contained the 31 documents that had been provided to his attorneys. Mr. Heppner argued that the documents were created to prepare his potential defense strategy in anticipation of an indictment, but he conceded that he made the decision to prepare the reports on his own, i.e., not at the direction of counsel. He nevertheless claimed the documents were protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine; the government moved to overrule the objections.
Reprinted courtesy of
Christopher J. Olsen, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.,
Freddy X. Muñoz, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and
Gary M. Stein, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
Mr. Olsen may be contacted at colsen@pecklaw.com
Mr. Muñoz may be contacted at fmunoz@pecklaw.com
Mr. Stein may be contacted at gstein@pecklaw.com
Read the full story...
Snell & Wilmer Named Among the “Most Admired Law Firms to Work For” by Los Angeles Business Journal
December 22, 2025 —
Snell & WilmerLOS ANGELES – Snell & Wilmer is proud to announce that its Los Angeles office has again been named to the Los Angeles Business Journal’s 2025 “Most Admired Law Firms to Work For.” The list highlights outstanding law firms in the L.A. area that are consciously working towards creating diverse, positive, and supportive environments to help drive the success of their attorneys. Firms appearing on the list were judged on company culture, employee benefit and support programs, as well as diversity and women’s initiatives.
“We are honored to be recognized once more as one of the ‘Most Admired Law Firms to Work For’ by the Los Angeles Business Journal”, said
Joshua Schneiderman, managing partner of the firm’s Los Angeles office. “Our focus remains on building a workplace where people feel supported, encouraged to grow, and connected to their colleagues, clients, and communities. We are committed to investing in programs, relationships, and opportunities that create long lasting career fulfillment.”
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Snell & Wilmer
Snell & Wilmer Receives Multiple National and Regional Top Tier Rankings in 2026 “Best Law Firms® Rankings” by Best Lawyers®
December 08, 2025 —
Snell & WilmerPHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is proud to announce it has once again been recognized by Best Law Firms®, earning 34 national and 199 regional rankings across 74 categories by Best Lawyers® in their annual Best Law Firms rankings. The firm received national Tier 1 rankings for its Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law, Commercial Litigation, Communications Law, Construction Law, Corporate Law, Litigation – Construction, Litigation – Labor and Employment, Litigation – Real Estate, Real Estate Law, and Securities Regulation categories. The firm also earned national rankings in 24 other categories, and 15 of its offices earned regional rankings. The 2026 Best Law Firms rankings are based on the highest number of participating firms and the highest number of client ballots on record. The rankings are determined through a rigorous evaluation process that includes the collection of client and lawyer evaluations, peer review from leading attorneys in their field, and review of additional information supporting a firm’s accomplishments. The following is the complete list of Snell & Wilmer practices ranked in the 2026 Best Law Firms:
National Rankings
Banking and Finance Law
Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law
Commercial Litigation
Communications Law
Construction Law
Corporate Law
Employment Law – Management
Energy Law
Environmental Law
Financial Services Regulation Law
Health Care Law
Labor Law – Management
Litigation – Banking and Finance
Litigation – Bankruptcy
Litigation – Construction
Litigation – Environmental
Litigation – Intellectual Property
Litigation – Labor and Employment
Litigation – Real Estate
Litigation – Regulatory Enforcement (SEC, Telecom, Energy)
Litigation – Securities
Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions – Defendants
Mergers and Acquisitions Law
Mining Law
Native American Law
Natural Resources Law
Patent Law
Real Estate Law
Securities / Capital Markets Law
Securities Regulation
Tax Law
Trademark Law
Trusts and Estates
Venture Capital Law
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Snell & Wilmer
New York Amends Prompt Payment Act: Retainage Above 5% in Private Construction Contracts Now Void
February 10, 2026 —
Mark A. Snyder, Levi W. Barrett, Patrick T. Murray & Skyler L. Santomartino - Peckar & Abramson, P.C.In 2023 New York overhauled its Prompt Payment Act. The
2023 amendments, largely aimed at restricting the amount of retainage that can be withheld on private projects, were unclear about whether parties could contract around the statute, as they can with other provisions of the statute. The State Legislature recently clarified that issue.
On December 19, 2025, New York enacted a new law, tightening the State’s Prompt Payment Act retainage laws by amending the Prompt Payment Act under General Business Law § 757. Under § 757, the new law renders void any contract provision in private construction contracts that requires retainage in excess of 5% of the total contract sum, meaning owners cannot hold more than 5% from their prime contractors and prime contractors cannot hold more than 5% from their subcontractors.
Reprinted courtesy of
Mark A. Snyder, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.,
Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.,
Patrick T. Murray, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and
Skyler L. Santomartino, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
Mr. Snyder may be contacted at msnyder@pecklaw.com
Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com
Mr. Murray may be contacted at pmurray@pecklaw.com
Mr. Santomartino may be contacted at ssantomartino@pecklaw.com
Read the full story...
Kahana Feld Partner Pascal Arteaga Achieves Prestigious TBLS Construction Law Board Certification
January 21, 2026 —
Kahana FeldKahana Feld is pleased to announce that partner
Pascal Arteaga has successfully passed the Texas Board of Legal Specialization (TBLS) Construction Law Board Certification Exam—one of the most rigorous specialty certifications in the state. The exam tests deep knowledge of construction-related statutes, contracts, claims, and project delivery systems and is only available to attorneys who first meet demanding experience, continuing legal education, and peer-reference requirements. This achievement reflects Pascal’s extensive experience across critical areas of construction law and his dedication to providing top-level service to his clients.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Kahana Feld
The AVOID Act: A New Timeline for Liability in New York Construction Projects
February 23, 2026 —
Meghan Douris - The Construction SeytBy April 18, 2026, New York construction litigation will operate on a faster—and far less forgiving—timeline. The Avoiding Vexatious Overuse of Impleading to Delay (the “AVOID Act”), signed into law on December 19, 2025, fundamentally rewrites third‑party practice under CPLR § 1007 by imposing strict deadlines to bring subcontractors, suppliers, and other responsible parties into a case.
For owners, developers, general contractors, and their in‑house counsel, this change will shift risk assessment, contract enforcement, and liti
A Year After Fatal Genoa Viaduct Collapse, Replacement Takes ShapeColorado Court of Appeals holds that insurance companies owe duty of prompt and effective communication to claimants and repair subcontractorsLoss Ensuing from Alleged Faulty Workmanship is CoveredSurvey: Workers Lack Awareness of Potentially Hazardous NanomaterialsInsurance Coverage for COVID-19? Two N.J. Courts Allow Litigation to ProceedCan an Owner Preemptively Avoid a Mechanics Lien?Contractor’s Burden When It Comes to DelayDamage Control: Major Rebuilds After Major Weather EventsTwo Worthy Insurance Topics: (1) Bad Faith, And (2) Settling Without Insurer’s ConsentIndustry Practices Questioned After Girder Fractures at Salesforce Transit CenterHousing Starts in U.S. Drop to Lowest Level in Three MonthsThe Greenest U.S. Cities & StatesOne Industry, One Goal: Construction Safety Week 2026Deterioration Known To Insured Forecloses Collapse CoverageColorado SB 15-177 UPDATE: Senate Business, Labor, & Technology Committee Refers Construction Defect Reform Bill to Full Senate#10 CDJ Topic: Carithers v. Mid-Continent Casualty CompanyA Reminder to Get Your Contractor’s License in VirginiaDispute Review Boards for Real-Time Dispute Avoidance and ResolutionAre Defense Costs In Addition to Policy Limits?Construction Termination Issues Part 5: What if You are the One that Wants to Quit?Construction Defects Are Occurrences, Says South Carolina High CourtInsurance Agent Sued for Lapse in Coverage after House CollapsesGovernor Brown Signs Legislation Aimed at Curbing ADA Accessibility Abuses in CaliforniaThe Jersey Shore gets Beach Prisms Designed to Reduce ErosionWindow Installer's Alleged Faulty Workmanship On Many Projects Constitutes Multiple OccurrencesPenalty for Failure to Release Expired LiensIs Ohio’s Buckeye Lake Dam Safe?Thank You Once Again for the Legal Elite Election for 2022Private Statutory Cause of Action Under Florida’s Underground Facility Damage Prevention and Safety ActNo Third-Quarter Gain for ConstructionDecades of WCC Seminar at the Disneyland ResortContractors Liable For Their Subcontractor’s Failure To Pay Its Employees’ Wages And BenefitsTrends and Issues which Can Affect Workers' Compensation Coverage for Construction CompaniesFinding Highway Compromise ‘Tough,’ DOT Secretary SaysIssuing Judgment After Confirmation of Appraisal Award OverturnedNew York Court Finds Insurers Cannot Recover Defense Costs Where No Duty to IndemnifyLook Out! Texas Building Shedding Marble PanelsToo Costly to Be Fair: Texas Appellate Court Finds the Arbitration Clause in a Residential Construction Contract UnenforceableFormer Owner Not Liable for Defects Discovered After SaleBe Wary of Construction Defects when Joining a Community AssociationInsurance Policy Language Really Does MatterSubsequent Purchaser Can Assert Claims for Construction DefectsAffordable Global Housing Will Cost $11 TrillionPolicy's Operation Classification Found AmbiguousStadium Intended for the 2010 World Cup Still Not ReadyEvergrande’s Condemned Towers on China’s Hawaii Show ThreatHamptons Home Up for Foreclosure That May Set RecordFlorida Governor Signs COVID-19 Liability ShieldMelissa Dewey Brumback Invited Into Claims & Litigation Management Alliance MembershipWhy Construction Firms Should Think Differently on the Issue of SustainabilityMontana Trial Court Holds That Youths Have Standing to Bring Constitutional Claims Against State Government For Alleged Climate Change-Related HarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal Holds That the Right to Repair Act Prohibits Class Actions Against Manufacturers of Products Completely Manufactured OffsiteNew York Considers Amendments to Construction Industry Wage Laws that Would Impose Significant Burden Upon ContractorsCalifornia Commission Recommends Switching To Fault-Based Wildfire Liability Standard for Public UtilitiesSupreme Court’s New York Harbor Case Isn’t a ‘Sopranos’ EpisodeInsured's Claim for Replacement Cost Denied2019 Legislative Changes Affecting the Construction IndustryThe Non-Imputation Affidavit in Real Estate Title InsuranceUsing the Prevention DoctrineHow Mobile Tools Are Capturing Safety Data on JobsitesLewis Brisbois Ranked Tier 1 Nationally for Insurance Law, Mass Tort/Class Actions Defense by U.S. News/Best LawyersWhose Employee is it Anyway?: Federal Court Finds No Coverage for Injured Subcontractor's Claim Based on Modified Employer's Liability ExclusionHow Retro-Commissioning Can Extend the Life of a Building—and the PlanetKey Legal Issues to Consider Before and After Natural DisastersGillotti v. Stewart (2017) 2017 WL 1488711 Rejects Liberty Mutual, Holding Once Again that the Right to Repair Act is the Exclusive Remedy for Construction Defect ClaimsThe Greenest U.S. Cities & StatesEPA Threatens Cut in California's Federal Highway FundsRevisiting the CMO; Are We Overusing the Mediation Privilege?Los Angeles Construction Sites May Be on Fault LinesHow Drones are Speeding Up Construction 
