BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California
    Anaheim California construction expert witnessAnaheim California forensic architectAnaheim California construction forensic expert witnessAnaheim California building code compliance expert witnessAnaheim California delay claim expert witnessAnaheim California construction cost estimating expert witnessAnaheim California construction claims expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211

    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211

    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501
    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501
    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614

    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614

    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614

    Anaheim California Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California


    Homebuilders Leading U.S. Consumer Stocks: EcoPulse

    Pennsylvania Mechanics’ Lien “Waivers” and “Releases”: What’s the Difference?

    The Pandemic, Proposed Federal Privacy Regulation and the CCPA

    Update: Supreme Court Issues Opinion in West Virginia v. EPA

    Can Anything Supersede Excel in AEC?

    Architect Searches for Lost Identity in a City Ravaged by War

    Contrasting Expert Opinions Result in Denial of Cross Motions for Summary Judgment

    How To Lock Disputes Out Of Your Project In Construction

    A Termination for Convenience Is Not a Termination for Default

    Digitalizing Cross-Laminated Timber Construction

    Public Contract Code 9204 – A New Mandatory Claims Process for Contractors and Subcontractors – and a Possible Trap for the Unwary

    Gillotti v. Stewart (2017) 2017 WL 1488711 Rejects Liberty Mutual, Holding Once Again that the Right to Repair Act is the Exclusive Remedy for Construction Defect Claims

    North Carolina Supreme Court Addresses “Trigger of Coverage,” Allocation and Exhaustion-Related Issues Arising Out of Benzene-Related Claims

    Deadlines. . . They’re Important. Project Owner Risks Losing Claim By Failing to Timely Identify “Doe” Defendant

    Oklahoma Finds Policy Can Be Assigned Post-Loss

    Florida Project Could Help Address Runoff, Algae Blooms

    Don’t Just Document- Document Right!

    Renters ‘Sold Out’ by NYC Pensions Press Mayor on Housing

    Avoid L&I Violations by Following Appropriate Safety Procedures

    New ANSI Requirements for Fireplace Screens

    Four Companies Sued in Pool Electrocution Case

    Safety Guidance for the Prevention of the Coronavirus on Construction Sites

    Supreme Court Finds Insurance Coverage for Intentional (and Despicable) Act of Contractor’s Employee

    Edward Beitz and William Taylor Recognized by US News – Best Lawyers as a "Lawyer of the Year"

    Arbitration and Mediation: What’s the Difference? What to Expect.

    Washington Supreme Court Finds Agent’s Representations in Certificate of Insurance Bind Insurance Company to Additional Insured Coverage

    Issue and Claim Preclusion When Forced to Litigate Similar Issues in Different Forums: White River Village, LLP v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland

    Newmeyer Dillion Attorneys Named to 2020 Southern California Rising Stars List

    Why Biden’s Infrastructure Plan Is a Green Jobs Plan

    The Arbitration Club… Is Not So Exclusive

    Insurers Reacting to Massachusetts Tornadoes

    Workers on Big California Bridge Tackle Oil Wells, Seismic Issues

    Texas Federal Court Finds Total Pollution Exclusion Does Not Foreclose a Duty to Defend Waterway Degradation Lawsuit

    Federal Subcontractor Who Failed to Follow FAR Regulations Finds That “Fair” and “Just” are Not Synonymous

    Colorado Legislature Kills SB 20-138 – A Bill to Extend Colorado’s Statute of Repose

    HB24-1014: A Warning Bell for Colorado Businesses Amid Potential Consumer Protection Changes

    CISA Guidance 3.1: Not Much Change for Construction

    Previously Owned U.S. Home Sales Rise to Eight-Month High

    New Orleans Terror Attack Lawsuit Targets Engineer Mott MacDonald, Contractor and City

    New Certification Requirements for Veteran-Owned Small Business Concerns and Service-Disabled Veteran-owned Small Business Concerns Seeking Public Procurement Contracts

    Bertha – The Tunnel is Finished, but Her Legacy Continues

    A Court-Side Seat: SCOTUS Clarifies Alien Tort Statute and WOTUS Is Revisited

    Toolbox Talk Series Recap – Arbitration Motion Practice

    Appraisal May Include Cause of Loss Issues

    Pulling the Plug

    Building Growth Raises Safety Concerns

    2021 California Construction Law Update

    Third Circuit Vacates Judgment for Insurer on Alleged Construction Defect Claim

    Alleged Damage to Personal Property Does Not Revive Coverage for Construction Defects

    Tall Mass Timber Buildings Now Possible Under 2021 IBC Code Changes
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Anaheim, California Roofing Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Anaheim's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Kahana Feld Secures Discontinuance with Prejudice in Fraudulent Case

    January 06, 2026 —
    Kahana Feld secured a victory for its client after uncovering evidence that the plaintiff’s alleged trip-and-fall claim was fraudulent. The plaintiff sought $8 million in damages and claimed serious spinal and knee injuries stemming from an incident outside a Bronx retail store. Through strategic investigation and a crucial non-party deposition, our team established that the plaintiff’s identified eyewitness was out of the country at the time of the alleged accident—contradicting the plaintiff’s testimony and confirming the falsity of the claim. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Fort Lauderdale Team Secures Defense Verdict for Client in Premises Liability Lawsuit

    December 30, 2025 —
    Fort Lauderdale, Fla. (October 27, 2025) - Fort Lauderdale Partner Paul Gamm and Associate Amber Dawson recently obtained a complete defense verdict for their client, a grocery store operator, in a premises liability case in Florida state court. The accident in question occurred in December 2022, when two vehicles collided at an uncontrolled internal parking lot intersection at the grocery store property. The plaintiff refused to blame the other driver, a non-party at trial. The plaintiff alleged that the intersection should have been controlled with a stop sign because it lacked the appropriate sight distance for drivers to perceive threats from oncoming traffic. The plaintiff filed suit against the client in the 17th Judicial Circuit Court of Florida. She claimed she suffered cervical and lumbar herniations, requiring one facet lumbar fusion and two outstanding surgeries. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    The AVOID Act: A New Timeline for Liability in New York Construction Projects

    February 23, 2026 —
    By April 18, 2026, New York construction litigation will operate on a faster—and far less forgiving—timeline. The Avoiding Vexatious Overuse of Impleading to Delay (the “AVOID Act”), signed into law on December 19, 2025, fundamentally rewrites third‑party practice under CPLR § 1007 by imposing strict deadlines to bring subcontractors, suppliers, and other responsible parties into a case. For owners, developers, general contractors, and their in‑house counsel, this change will shift risk assessment, contract enforcement, and litigation strategy to the very front end of a claim—particularly in New York Labor Law and construction defect cases. What Changed—and Why It Matters to Construction Cases Historically, New York defendants could implead subcontractors and other players well into discovery. The AVOID Act ends that practice. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com

    If You Get ‘Reported to the Board’ for Your Professional License (Law Note)

    January 21, 2026 —
    The NC Board of Architecture and the NC Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors (as well as other Boards, including the NC Licensing Board for General Contractors) have grievance procedures in which anyone – client or not—can file a grievance against you. That’s the bad news. The good news is that the Boards have seen it all before, and if the grievance is someone unhappy about a bill, or using the process to harass you for unfounded reasons, they will recognize those complaints for what they are. HOWEVER, this does not mean that you should treat any grievance, no matter how unfounded, lightly. The first thing you need to do is contact your insurance broker/agent and report the matter. Often times, your insurance carrier will hire an attorney (someone like me) to defend you free of charge (at least up to a certain dollar amount). This is part of your insurance coverage, and you should take full advantage of it. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Melissa Dewey Brumback, Ragsdale Liggett PLLC
    Ms. Brumback may be contacted at mbrumback@rl-law.com

    Promptly Notifying Your Insurer of a Claim Matters

    December 30, 2025 —
    Does promptly notifying your insurer of a claim matter? A recent case out of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals answers this question in the affirmative. MAKE SURE TO PROMPTLY NOTIFY YOUR INSURER OF A POTENTIAL CLAIM. In L. Squared Industries, Inc. v. Nautilus Ins. Co., 31 Fla.L.Weekly C529a (11th Cir. 2025), an insured owned gas stations and had a claims-made storage tank liability insurance policy. The policy provided: “You must see to it that we are notified as soon as reasonably possible, but in any event, not more than seven (7) days after the insured first became aware of, or should have become aware of a pollution condition which may result in a claim or any action or proceeding to impose an obligation on the insured for cleanup costs . . . .” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Meet BWB&O’s Super Lawyers Rising Stars in Colorado!

    April 08, 2026 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is thrilled to share that Partner Devin Brunson and Associate Melissa Youngpeter have been named to the Super Lawyers 2026 Colorado Rising Stars list. This recognition reflects their exceptional work in Personal Injury and Civil Litigation.
    SUPER LAWYERS RISING STARS
    Devin Brunson: 2024-2026
    Melissa Youngpeter: 2026
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP

    Time to Negotiate Limitation on Remedies and Damages Is on the Front End

    February 10, 2026 —
    Remember, when it comes to contracts, the time to negotiate and enter into mutually agreed upon bargains is on the front end. And, if the contract is not negotiable, at least you know that and can make the business decision whether you want to accept the bargains and risks. If you don’t, well, you can walk away. Move onto another deal. If you do, then you make the business decision as to the bargains or risk transfers and accept them moving forward. One of those bargains and risks deals with a limitation on damages and remedies. In a recent dispute dealing with the sale of an aircraft, there was a provision dealing with the buyer and seller’s remedies in the event of a breach. (Similar to a real estate transaction or other buyer-seller scenario.) “Contract section 10.4(a) stated that if the buyer defaulted, the seller’s “exclusive remedies” were to keep the aircraft and the buyer’s deposit. Section 10.4(b) stated that if the seller defaulted by “fail[ing] to deliver the [aircraft] in accordance with the terms of [the contract],” the buyer’s “sole remedies” were the seller’s reimbursement of the buyer’s inspection costs.” Sky Aviation Holdings, LLC v. Aviation Unlimited, 50 Fla.L.Weekly D2658c (Fla. 4th DCA 2025). As you can see, there was a limitation on the seller’s damages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    New California Law Mandates Prompt Resolution of Change Order Payment Disputes on Private Works of Improvement

    January 05, 2026 —
    On October 10, 2025, Governor Newsom signed SB 440, titled the Private Works Change Order Fair Payment Act. The new law introduces a process and deadlines for handling change order, time extension and payment disputes on private-works construction projects. SB 440 will apply to contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2026, and will remain in effect until January 1, 2030. What Is Changing? Construction projects often undergo changes during the construction process that may result in additional costs for labor and materials. Currently, there are no specific processes mandated for resolving change orders on private works of improvement in California. On January 1, 2017, California implemented Public Contract Code section 9204 to provide a claims resolution process for contractors engaged in public works projects, and SB 440 seeks to implement a similar process for private, nonresidential construction projects. Reprinted courtesy of Samuel Bucher, Pillsbury, Marc Coats, Pillsbury and William S. Hale, P.E., Pillsbury Mr. Bucher may be contacted at samuel.bucher@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Coats may be contacted at marc.coats@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Hale may be contacted at william.hale@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...