Massachusetts Nuclear Verdict Leads To $90M Bad Faith Award
February 10, 2026 —
Eric B. Hermanson & Timothy J. Langan - White and WilliamsInsurers in Massachusetts have long struggled with the demands of MGL ch. G.L.c 176D, § 3(9)(f), which requires “prompt, fair and equitable settlements of claims in which liability has become reasonably clear.” Last month a Superior Court ruling illustrated the potentially draconian consequences of a violation: finding an insurer liable for more than $90 million in bad faith damages, in a case that might have settled under $3 million with proper handling.
The claimant, John Rooney, was a mason who fell off a scaffold at a construction site. He sued the general contractor. The general contractor, in turn, sought coverage as an additional insured under a series of Liberty Mutual policies issued to Rooney’s employer – the masonry company – with combined aggregate limits of $19.5 million.
Reprinted courtesy of
Eric B. Hermanson, White and Williams and
Timothy J. Langan, White and Williams
Mr. Hermanson may be contacted at hermansone@whiteandwilliams.com
Mr. Langan may be contacted at langant@whiteandwilliams.com
Read the full story...
New Year’s Resolution: Engineering the “Tee-Up Day” for Complex Construction Mediations
February 17, 2026 —
Joël Bertet - The Dispute ResolverThe construction industry is defined by its commitment to "Critical Path" scheduling. From the moment a project breaks ground, every stakeholder—from the MEP sub to the owner’s rep—is focused on sequencing. We know that you cannot hang drywall before the rough-in is inspected, and you cannot pour a slab-on-grade until the vapor barrier is verified.
Yet, when these projects devolve into litigation, the legal community often abandons the logic of sequencing. We rush headlong into "The Mediation Day"—a high-stakes, expensive, one-day marathon where we expect dozens of parties, hundreds of insurance layers, and thousands of pages of expert reports to magically align into a settlement by 6:00 PM.
As we open our calendars for the new year, it is time for a professional resolution. We must stop treating mediation as a single-day event and start treating it as a managed, sequenced process. The centerpiece of this resolution is the “Tee-Up Day.”
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Joël Bertet, ResolveBertetMr. Bertet may be contacted at
joel@resolvebertet.com
The AI Knows Too Much: When Employees Feed Trade Secrets into Generative AI Tools
April 14, 2026 —
Kazim A. Naqvi & John V. Mysliwiec - SheppardEvery time an employee pastes proprietary source code, a customer list, or a confidential business strategy into
ChatGPT,
Claude, or
Google Gemini, they may be quietly dismantling the legal protections that make those secrets worth protecting. Courts and regulators are only beginning to grapple with this problem, and right now, the burden of preventing it falls squarely on employers.
The Legal Stakes
Under the federal
Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”) and the
Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“UTSA”) as adopted across most states, a trade secret plaintiff must show that the information at issue was subject to reasonable measures to maintain its secrecy. Courts have historically credited measures like confidentiality agreements, physical access controls, and employee training—but those safeguards were designed for a world of thumb drives and disgruntled employees. They were not built for a world where a well-meaning engineer can, in seconds, transmit an entire corpus of proprietary data to a third-party AI platform operating under terms of service that may permit the provider to use inputs for model training.
Reprinted courtesy of
Kazim A. Naqvi, Sheppard and
John V. Mysliwiec, Sheppard
Mr. Naqvi may be contacted at knaqvi@sheppard.com
Mr. Mysliwiec may be contacted at jmysliwiec@sheppard.com
Read the full story...
Kahana Feld Secures Discontinuance with Prejudice in Fraudulent Case
January 06, 2026 —
Kahana FeldKahana Feld secured a victory for its client after uncovering evidence that the plaintiff’s alleged trip-and-fall claim was fraudulent. The plaintiff sought $8 million in damages and claimed serious spinal and knee injuries stemming from an incident outside a Bronx retail store.
Through strategic investigation and a crucial non-party deposition, our team established that the plaintiff’s identified eyewitness was out of the country at the time of the alleged accident—contradicting the plaintiff’s testimony and confirming the falsity of the claim.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Kahana Feld
Anomaly in Adding a Third-Party Claimant to a Liability Insurance Coverage Dispute
May 05, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesIn an insurance coverage lawsuit seeking declaratory relief, an insurer sued the third-party claimant. The insurer was seeking a declaration that there was no coverage, which naturally would impact the third-party claimant. The insured did not respond to the lawsuit and the insurer moved for a default judgment which was objected to by the third-party claimant. The trial court granted a final judgment in favor of the insurer, which prompted an appeal from the third-party claimant because the final judgment impacts its rights to coverage if it obtains a judgment against the insured.
The appellate court reversed but please take a look at this Court’s discussion on the issue of an insurer adding a third-party claimant to a coverage lawsuit when then the third-party cannot pursue a direct claim against the insurer until it obtains a settlement or judgment against the insured. It presents an interesting argument and counter-point for a third-party claimant that is added to the coverage lawsuit which has implications if it obtains a judgment against the insured:
This case involves an apparent anomaly in Florida law. It is well-established that third-party claimants injured by an insured’s negligence have a right as third-party beneficiaries to payment from the insured’s insurance proceeds. It is equally well-established that the third-party claimants’ rights in this regard do not accrue unless and until they obtain a verdict or settlement against the insured. A quick review of this law is helpful at this point.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Agent Not Liable for Loss Given Insured’s Vague Instructions for Coverage
April 08, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe Illinois Appellate Court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insured’s agent because there was no breach of duty. Jon Van Order v. Hauk, et al., 2025 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2378 (Ill. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2025).
The insured began renovating a vacant home in October 2018. He met with agent Joseph Hauk and explained the property was vacant and would be going through renovations for the next several months. Hauk then procured a policy through Shelter Insurance Company insuring the vacant property against several specified perils. The policy provided coverage for water damage if “[t]he exterior of the building sustained a covered loss” and “that loss created an opening through which the water entered.” Damage caused by escaping water from within a plumbing system was excluded if: (1) the damage was caused by a “continuous or repeated leakage over a period of fourteen days or more” or (2) the insured premises had been vacant for 30 consecutive days immediately preceding the loss.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Appeals Court Upholds Skanska, Granite Win in ‘I-4 Ultimate’ JV Dispute
June 15, 2026 —
Bryan Gottlieb - Engineering News-RecordA federal appeals court has upheld a lower court’s decision requiring The Lane Construction Corp. to pay roughly $79 million in damages, plus interest, to joint venture partners Skanska USA Civil Southeast and Granite Construction for work on Florida’s I-4 Ultimate highway megaproject in Orlando, which was completed in 2022.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-RecordMr. Gottlieb may be contacted at
gottliebb@enr.com
An “Agreement to Agree” Is Not a Binding Contract
January 13, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesA driving issue in a recent dispute was whether a binding contract existed simply through the selection of a proposal in response to a solicitation. Or, was there nothing more than an “agreement to agree,” which does not create a binding contract. There is an important distinction between a binding contract an an “agreement to agree.”
A Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) issued a Request for Proposals otherwise referred to as an RFP. The RFP specifically stated that the CRA and proposer will be c
What If an Irma-Like Hurricane Hit the New York City Metro Area?Colorado Senate Revives Construction Defects Reform BillBuy America/Buy American, a Primer For ContractorsPlehat Brings Natural Environments into Design Tools Design & Construction Case Expands Florida’s Slavin DoctrineThree Key Takeaways from Recent Hotel Website ADA LitigationBig News for “Smaller” Construction CasesCan a Home Builder Disclaim Implied Warranties of Workmanship and Habitability?Improvements to Confederate Monuments Lead to LawsuitsWhen OSHA Cites YouPreserving Lien Rights on Private Projects in Washington: Three Common Mistakes to AvoidFive Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2025 Southern California Super Lawyers ListLuxury-Apartment Boom Favors D.C.’s Millennial RentersDesign Immunity Does Not Shield Public Entity From Claim That it Failed to Warn of a Dangerous Condition Quick Note: Unenforceable Language in Arbitration ProvisionHome Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Rose at Slower Pace in MayInsurer's Failure to Settle Does Not Justify Multiple Damages under Unfair Claims Settlement Law“Based On”… What Exactly? NJ Appellate Division Examines Phrase and Estops Insurer From Disclaiming Coverage for 20-Month DelayHarmon Towers Duty to Defend Question Must Wait, Says CourtLiquidated Damages: A Dangerous AfterthoughtWho, Me?Sinking S.F. Tower Prompts More LawsuitsDefect Claims Called “Witch Hunt”Congratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected to the 2024 Southern California Super Lawyers ListInsurer's Motion to Dismiss Allegations of Collapse RejectedCalifornia Contractor Spills Coffee on Himself by Failing to Stay Mechanics Lien Action While Pursuing ArbitrationFormal Opinion No. 2020-203: How A Lawyer Is to Handle Access to Client Confidential Information and Anticipation of Potential Security IssuesA Retrospective As-Built Schedule Analysis Can Be Used to Support DelayBrief Overview of Rights of Unlicensed Contractors in CaliforniaCoverage for Named Windstorm Removed by Insured, Terminating Such CoverageTen-Year Statute Of Repose To Sue For Latent Construction DefectsAppraisers’ Failure to Perform Assessment of Property’s Existence or Damage is Reversible ErrorCongratulations to BWB&O’s Newport Beach Team for Prevailing on a Highly Contested Motion to Quash!The "Dark Overlord" Strikes The Practice Of Law: What Law Firms Can Do To Protect ThemselvesHome Sales Going to Investors in Daytona Beach AreaPa. Contractor Pleads No Contest to Prevailing-Wage Charges, Pays Workers $20.7MA Funny Thing Happened to My Ground Lease in Bankruptcy CourtCal/OSHA ETS: Newest Version Effective TodayMontana Theater Threatened by Closure due to Building SafetyCan a Non-Signatory Invoke an Arbitration Provision?Toll Brothers Report End of Year ResultsNew Jersey Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Coverage Gap DisputeThe Requirement to State a “Sum Certain” No Longer a Jurisdictional Bar to Government Contract ClaimsHe's the Top U.S. Mortgage Salesman. His Daughter Isn't Buying ItUpdate Regarding New York City’s Climate Mobilization Act (CMA) and the Reduction of Carbon Emissions in New York CityThe Risk of A Fixed Price Contract Is The MarketThe Association of Southern California Defense Counsel (ASCDC) and the Construction Defect Claims Managers Association (CDMA) Annual Construction Defect SeminarLocal Government’s Claims on Developer Bonds Dismissed for Failure to Pursue Administrative RemediesCalifornia Bullet Train Clears Federal Environmental ApprovalNavigating Construction Contracts in the Energy Sector – Insights from Sheppard Mullin’s Webinar SeriesBaltimore Project Pushes To Meet Federal DeadlineOrder for Appraisal Affirmed After Insureds Comply with Post-Loss ObligationsGovernor Ducey Vetoes Water and Development BillsClient Alert: Court Settles Conflict between CCP and Rules of Court Regarding Demurrer Deadline Following Amended ComplaintDavid M. McLain to Speak at the CLM Claims College - School of Construction - Scholarships AvailableHistory of Defects Leads to Punitive Damages for Bankrupt DeveloperNot So Fast, My Friend: Pacing and Concurrent Delay 
