Are Robotic Coworkers Soon a Reality in Construction?
March 24, 2026 —
Aarni Heiskanen - AEC BusinessGeneral-purpose humanoid robots are in the headlines, but is the hype justified? What’s the point of having a robot home assistant when it still needs a “guy behind the curtain” to control it remotely?
Despite the challenges, robots, even those that look like humans, are seriously considered as future coworkers in business environments.
According to the McKinsey report
‘Will embodied AI create robotic coworkers?‘ the idea that AI-powered robots will become general-purpose coworkers is grounded in real technological progress, but not an overnight reality.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Aarni Heiskanen, AEC BusinessMr. Heiskanen may be contacted at
aec-business@aepartners.fi
Allegations in Insured’s Complaint Sufficient to Survive Motion to Dismiss
November 09, 2025 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe insured’s complaint sufficiently pled breach of contract and bad faith to survive the insurer’s motion to dismiss. Macias v. Am. Family Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148628 (D. Colo. Aug. 1, 2025).
A hailstorm damaged the insureds’ property, including the roof. The insureds filed a claim (Claim One) with American Family. An adjuster assigned by American Family found storm-related damage to the gutters, window screens and lattice work, but only non-storm-related damage to other items, such as the roof. American Family determined the losses amounted to $1,104.97, which was below the deductible.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
White and Williams LLP Recognized on the List of Largest Law Firms in Greater Philadelphia
March 03, 2026 —
White and Williams LLPWhite and Williams LLP was recently recognized on the list of Largest Law Firms in Greater Philadelphia by the Philadelphia Business Journal. The Firm is ranked #10 among the largest law firms in the Greater Philadelphia area.
This listing ranks over 500 law firms in the counties of Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, or Philadelphia in Pennsylvania; Atlantic, Burlington, Camden, or Gloucester in New Jersey, and Kent or New Castle in Delaware. White and Williams has been named on the list since 2023.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
White and Williams LLP
New York Amends Prompt Payment Act: Retainage Above 5% in Private Construction Contracts Now Void
February 10, 2026 —
Mark A. Snyder, Levi W. Barrett, Patrick T. Murray & Skyler L. Santomartino - Peckar & Abramson, P.C.In 2023 New York overhauled its Prompt Payment Act. The
2023 amendments, largely aimed at restricting the amount of retainage that can be withheld on private projects, were unclear about whether parties could contract around the statute, as they can with other provisions of the statute. The State Legislature recently clarified that issue.
On December 19, 2025, New York enacted a new law, tightening the State’s Prompt Payment Act retainage laws by amending the Prompt Payment Act under General Business Law § 757. Under § 757, the new law renders void any contract provision in private construction contracts that requires retainage in excess of 5% of the total contract sum, meaning owners cannot hold more than 5% from their prime contractors and prime contractors cannot hold more than 5% from their subcontractors.
Reprinted courtesy of
Mark A. Snyder, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.,
Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.,
Patrick T. Murray, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and
Skyler L. Santomartino, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
Mr. Snyder may be contacted at msnyder@pecklaw.com
Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com
Mr. Murray may be contacted at pmurray@pecklaw.com
Mr. Santomartino may be contacted at ssantomartino@pecklaw.com
Read the full story...
Don’t Breach Your Contract, but If You Do, Don’t Breach First
December 22, 2025 —
Christopher G. Hill - Construction Law MusingsWell, it’s been a while since my last post here at
Musings due to travel, work, Thanksgiving, etc. so I thought I’d let a recent case remind us all that while breaching a construction contract is bad, doing it first is even worse. This is the so called “doctrine of first breach” that basically states that if both parties are in breach (or even just one), then the first to breach is the one that will bear the costs of breach. The doctrine also states that the one first to breach first can’t enforce any of its rights going forward.
The plaintiff in
SEG Props. LLC v. NTC Mazzuca Constr.,Inc., the Virginia Court of Appeals considered a first breach scenario that was pretty extreme. The basic facts are as follows:
SEG hired Mazzuca to build a private shooting range and hired a property manager (Jones, Lang, LaSalle, Inc. (“JLL”)) as its project representative. Per the contract, if Mazzuca provided a payment application on or before the 25th of the month, payment was due by the 25th of the following month. In no event was payment to be made more than 30 days from receipt of the payment application by the owner’s representative. Even where there was a dispute, the undisputed amounts were to be paid. Mazzuca and JLL used a so called “pencil” method for payment applications that involved JLL reviewing the payment applications for errors and then a final payment application with the corrections being sent to the Architect. Needless to say there were change orders and disputes, but after the smoke cleared, it was obvious that from the first payment application, SEG had failed to make timely payment (for the whole saga, please read the case as it is too long for this post). Later, SEG terminated Mazzuca for cause upon one day’s notice that SEG would be supplementing Mazzuca’s workforce.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
The Law Office of Christopher G. HillMr. Hill may be contacted at
chrisghill@constructionlawva.com
Microscopic Soot, Major Win: Policyholder Coverage Expands
January 06, 2026 —
Scott P. DeVries & Natalie Reed - Hunton Insurance Recovery BlogIn a recent opinion, the 8th Circuit rejected an insurer’s attempt to expand insurer victories in a COVID-19 context to other more traditional claims of property damage. Reaffirming long standing principles, the court held soot and water damage associated with a fire constituted “direct physical loss or damage” under a commercial property insurance policy.
The policyholder, Maxus Metropolitan, sued their insurer, Travelers, which had refused to reimburse Maxus for remediation costs associated with a fire at their building. The dispute arose after one of six buildings in a complex owned by Maxus caught fire. Travelers covered part of the damage for the building that caught fire. However, seven months after the fire, Maxus learned of soot and water damage throughout the other five buildings, some of which were under construction and some that had residents. The commercial property policy Travelers issued to Maxus covered up to $35 million in “direct physical loss…or damage.” Travelers refused to reimburse for the remediation and in response Maxus sued Travelers for breach of contract and vexatious refusal to pay in Missouri.
Reprinted courtesy of
Scott P. DeVries, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and
Natalie Reed, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
Mr. DeVries may be contacted at sdevries@hunton.com
Ms. Reed may be contacted at nreed@hunton.com
Read the full story...
New Year’s Resolution: Engineering the “Tee-Up Day” for Complex Construction Mediations
February 17, 2026 —
Joël Bertet - The Dispute ResolverThe construction industry is defined by its commitment to "Critical Path" scheduling. From the moment a project breaks ground, every stakeholder—from the MEP sub to the owner’s rep—is focused on sequencing. We know that you cannot hang drywall before the rough-in is inspected, and you cannot pour a slab-on-grade until the vapor barrier is verified.
Yet, when these projects devolve into litigation, the legal community often abandons the logic of sequencing. We rush headlong in
Where There's Smoke...California's New Emergency Wildfire Smoke Protection Regulation And What Employers Are Required To DoCare, Custody or Control Exclusion Requires Complete and Exclusive Control by Insured Claiming Coverage25 Days After Explosion, Another Utility Shuts Off Gas in Boston AreaFifth Circuit: Primary Insurer Relieved of Duty to Defend Without Release of Liability of InsuredInsurer Must Defend and Indemnify Construction Defect Claims Under Iowa LawContractors Admit Involvement in KickbacksIllinois Earns C- on its 2022 Infrastructure Report Card while Making Strides on Roads and TransitNo Coverage for Contractor's Faulty WorkmanshipYou Cannot Always Contract Your Way Out of a Problem (The Case for Dispute Resolution in Mega and Large Complex Construction Projects)City Sues over Leaking Sewer SystemDaily Reports – The Swiss Army Knife of Project DocumentationFederal Arbitration Act Preempts Pennsylvania Payment ActNo Coverage Under Anti-Concurrent Causation ClauseGovernor Signs Permit Extension Bill Extending Permit Deadlines to One YearCommencing of the Statute of Repose for Construction DefectsThe 2024 Colorado Legislative Session Promises to be a Busy One for the Construction Industry and its InsurersEnvironmental Suit Against Lockheed Martin DismissedABC Chapter President Comments on Miami Condo CollapseCan a Lease Force a Tenant's Insurer to Defend the Landlord?Who Will Pay for San Francisco's $750 Million Tilting Tower?Benefit of the Coblentz Agreement and Consent JudgmentZetlin & De Chiara Ranked in the Top Tier for Construction Law by Legal 500 USAInsurer Granted Summary Judgment After Insured Fails to Establish Claim is CoveredThe Law Clinic Paves Way to the Digitalization of Built Environment ProcessesMeritage Acquires Legendary CommunitiesDefense Owed to Insured Subcontractor, but not to Additional Insured“He Chose…Poorly: How Bad DSC Clauses Lead to Project Doom in the Last Crusade of Construction Risk”#9 CDJ Topic: Vallagio at Inverness Residential Condominium Association, Inc. v. Metropolitan Homes, Inc., et al.Construction Defect Claim over LAX Runways20 Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in Sacramento Magazine 2020 Top Lawyers!Trump Replaces Architect to Lead $300 Million Ballroom DesignElon Musk's Boring Co. Is Feuding With Texas Over a DrivewayAn “Agreement to Agree” Is Not a Binding ContractTokyo Tackles Flood Control as Typhoons Swamp SubwaysInvestigation of Orange County LandslidePartner Denis Moriarty and Of Counsel William Baumgaertner Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 20174 Ways to Mitigate Construction DisputesChambers Global 2026 Recognizes Sheppard Practices and AttorneysWhen Can a General Contractor’s Knowledge be Imputed to a Developer?Make Sure You Comply with Florida’s Pre-Suit Notice Requirements for Construction DefectsWaste Not: NJ Digester Plant Transforms Food Waste to FuelLoan Modifications Due to COVID-19 Pandemic: FDIC Answers CARES Act FAQsCoverage Exists for Landlord as Additional InsuredNew World Cup Stadiums Failed at their First TrialInsurer Must Defend Claims of Alleged Willful Coal RemovalBlue-Sky Floods Take a Rising Toll for BusinessesCalifornia Court of Appeal Holds a Tenant Owes No Duty to Protect a Social Guest From a Defective Sidewalk Leading to a Condominium UnitThe California Legislature Passes SB 496 Limiting Design Professional Defense and Indemnity ObligationsSometimes a Reminder is in Order. . .Reminder: Your MLA Notice Must Have Your License Numberspan>
Antitrust Walker Process Claims Not Covered Under Personal Injury Coverage for Malicious ProsecutionLoss Ensuing from Alleged Faulty Workmanship is CoveredGeorgia Court Rules that Separate Settlements Are Not the End of the Matter John Palmeri and Peter Siachos Named to 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Lawyers in AmericaDeadline for Hurricane Ian Disaster Recovery Applications AnnouncedAmerican Roads Are Paved With InefficiencyThe Independent Tort Doctrine (And Its Importance)Crane Dangles and So Do Insurance QuestionsChicago Cubs Agree to Make Wrigley Field ADA Improvements to Settle Feds' LawsuitCongratulations to Associate Madeline Arcellana on Her Selection as a Top Rank Attorney in Southern Nevada!Buyers Are Flocking to NYC’s Suburbs. Too Bad There Aren’t Many Homes to Sell.BIM Legal Liabilities: Not That DifferentSubcontract Should Flow Down Delay Caused by Subcontractors 
